Weave Digital Studio

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.7/5 (12 reviews)
+6433510445 hello@weave.co.nz Visit Website

About Weave Digital Studio

Weave Digital Studio works with clients to plan, build, and ship digital products. Weave Digital Studio focuses on Mobile App Development and Custom Software Development. Projects with this company average about $55,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to Weave Digital Studio directly to discuss project specifics.

Where We Specialize

20% App Marketing
App Marketing 20%
Mobile App Development 18%
Web Development 18%
SEO 17%
Social Media Marketing 11%
Advertising, Media 7%
E-commerce Development 5%
Digital Strategy 4%

Industry Expertise

Retail100%

Typical Project Size

47% Small Business
30% Enterprise
23% Midmarket Business

Weave Digital Studio Reviews

Write a Review

Connected hardware platform that eliminated the blind spots in our operational data

Hyun-Su Lim / Director of Platform - Hanam Tech Solutions
Verified
Feb 01, 2026

Project summary: An international expansion required multi-currency, multi-language, and multi-warehouse capabilities that our existing platform could not support without a fundamental re-architecture.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryRetail & E-commerce
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Hanam Tech Solutions is an established Retail & E-commerce organisation headquartered in Incheon, South Korea. My role as Director of Platform covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IoT Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IoT Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Retail & E-commerce experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Proactive support that resolved a network issue at two in the morning before anyone arrived at the office

Marcus Holloway / SVP of Engineering - Vertex Cloud Dynamics
Verified
Jan 23, 2026

Project summary: Multi-touch attribution across our media mix had become the most-requested capability from every client in our portfolio. We could not deliver it without rebuilding our data layer.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Managed Services
IndustryAdvertising & Marketing
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As SVP of Engineering at Vertex Cloud Dynamics I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Advertising & Marketing operations in Austin, USA. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IT Managed Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their IT Managed Services approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Advertising & Marketing contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Advertising & Marketing network — in both cases to peers facing IT Managed Services challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

FAQs

Which industries does Weave Digital Studio serve?
Weave Digital Studio has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Construction, Energy & Utilities, Telecommunications and Retail & E-commerce.
Is Weave Digital Studio suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Weave Digital Studio because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Construction, Energy & Utilities, Telecommunications and Retail & E-commerce, and its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, App Marketing, Digital Strategy, E-commerce Development and Mobile App Development.
How can I contact Weave Digital Studio for a project?
Businesses can contact Weave Digital Studio through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Construction, Energy & Utilities, Telecommunications and Retail & E-commerce, and it has been operating since N/A.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Weave Digital Studio, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in New-zealand, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Is Weave Digital Studio an offshore software development company?
Weave Digital Studio may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in New-zealand, and it has been operating since N/A.
Does Weave Digital Studio offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Weave Digital Studio provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, App Marketing, Digital Strategy, E-commerce Development and Mobile App Development, and it has been operating since N/A.
Can Weave Digital Studio build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Weave Digital Studio, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has served clients in New-zealand, and its listed capabilities span Advertising, Media, App Marketing, Digital Strategy, E-commerce Development and Mobile App Development.
Does Weave Digital Studio sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Weave Digital Studio, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Construction, Energy & Utilities, Telecommunications and Retail & E-commerce, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Which countries does Weave Digital Studio serve?
Weave Digital Studio may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including New-zealand, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Weave Digital Studio develop SaaS products?
Yes, Weave Digital Studio may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Construction, Energy & Utilities, Telecommunications and Retail & E-commerce, and it has been operating since N/A.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $45,000+
Client Rating 4.7/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6