Vivify Ideas

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
+3812028029202120662420615 contact@vivifyideas.com Visit Website

About Vivify Ideas

Businesses looking for a reliable technology partner often consider Vivify Ideas. Their work spans web development, mobile apps, and custom software projects. The company operates with a team of 50 - 249 professionals. Typical hourly rates run around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $35,000. Clients have rated Vivify Ideas 5.0 out of 5 in 1 reviews. Vivify Ideas operates out of Novi Sad, Serbia. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Vivify Ideas.

Where We Specialize

28% Web Development
Web Development 28%
Mobile App Development 23%
Agile Web Development 19%
Enterprise App Development 17%
AI Development 13%

Industry Expertise

Media & Entertainment76% Manufacturing24%

Typical Project Size

43% Enterprise
31% Midmarket Business
26% Small Business

Vivify Ideas Reviews

Write a Review

Proactive support that resolved a network issue at two in the morning before anyone arrived at the office

Imogen Tanner / Head of Engineering - Outback Data Solutions
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: Our audience data was fragmented across eight tools with no single identity layer. Personalisation had become impossible without first solving the data foundation.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Managed Services
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Engineering at Outback Data Solutions I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Media & Entertainment operations in Melbourne, Australia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IT Managed Services capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IT Managed Services delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their IT Managed Services approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Media & Entertainment contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Melbourne, Australia and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Media & Entertainment network — in both cases to peers facing IT Managed Services challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Custom modules that fit our operational processes rather than forcing us to change them

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd, a growth-stage Manufacturing business based in Dublin, Ireland. As VP of Engineering my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Manufacturing market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The ERP Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end ERP Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Manufacturing sector had used them for a comparable ERP Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, ERP Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex ERP Development programme in the Manufacturing space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

FAQs

Which industries does Vivify Ideas serve?
Vivify Ideas has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Information Technology, Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing and Manufacturing.
How long does Vivify Ideas take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, Vivify Ideas can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Vivify Ideas?
Businesses may choose Vivify Ideas based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2013, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Vivify Ideas provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Vivify Ideas, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
How can I contact Vivify Ideas for a project?
Businesses can contact Vivify Ideas through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Information Technology, Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing and Manufacturing, and it has served clients in Serbia.
Does Vivify Ideas offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Vivify Ideas provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Does Vivify Ideas sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Vivify Ideas, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has served clients in Serbia, and it has experience across industries such as Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Information Technology, Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing and Manufacturing.
Does Vivify Ideas develop SaaS products?
Yes, Vivify Ideas may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Information Technology, Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing and Manufacturing, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What is Vivify Ideas's software development process?
Vivify Ideas typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has been operating since 2013.
How do I request a proposal from Vivify Ideas?
You can request a proposal from Vivify Ideas by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Information Technology, Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing and Manufacturing, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $35,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.2
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.5