Unleashed Technologies

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+14108648980 start@unleashed-technologies.com Visit Website

About Unleashed Technologies

Since 2007, Unleashed Technologies has operated as a technology services provider. Their core services include Mobile App Development and Custom Software Development. With 10 - 49 people on staff, Unleashed Technologies can take on projects of varying size. Typical hourly rates run around $100 - $149/hr, with an average project cost near $10,000. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Unleashed Technologies.

Where We Specialize

18% App Marketing
App Marketing 18%
Ethereum Blockchain 17%
Web Development 12%
VR App Development 12%
AI Development 10%
Mobile App Development 8%
Software Development 8%
AR App Development 6%
Mobile App Design 5%
Enterprise App Modernization 4%

Industry Expertise

Insurance90% Entertainment10%

Typical Project Size

42% Small Business
31% Enterprise
27% Midmarket Business

Unleashed Technologies Reviews

Write a Review

Paid media management that outperformed our previous agency on every metric

Maximilian Schreiber / Director of IT - Schreiber Logistik GmbH
Verified
Jul 04, 2025

Project summary: The project had both a hard delivery date tied to a board commitment and a scope that our previous agency had told us was not achievable. We needed someone to prove otherwise.

The engagement started with a discovery workshop that immediately signalled this team was different. They pushed back on two of our assumptions in the first session with evidence and a better alternative. That kind of intellectual honesty is rare and it set the tone for the whole project. Deliverables were consistently ahead of schedule, code reviews were taken seriously, and the final product is something we are proud to show enterprise clients during due diligence calls.

PROS

Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence

CONS

The initial project brief document they required was more detailed than we were used to providing, but in hindsight that rigour was part of why the project ran so smoothly

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryAgriculture
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationAug 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Schreiber Logistik GmbH, a mid-sized organisation in the Agriculture sector headquartered in Hamburg, Germany. My remit as Director of IT covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Digital Marketing expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Digital Marketing but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in Digital Marketing, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Agriculture domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Agriculture sector who were facing similar Digital Marketing challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

Sales pipeline visibility we had wanted for years, delivered in twelve weeks

Tyler Nguyen / Founder & CTO - BlueRidge Software
Verified
Mar 10, 2022

Project summary: Our creative production workflow was entirely manual and we were spending more time on process administration than on ideas — automation was long overdue.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Senior engineers on our account throughout the entire project rather than a bait-and-switch to juniors after contract signing, transparent reporting, realistic estimates that proved accurate

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryAdvertising & Marketing
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationDec 2024 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
BlueRidge Software is a Advertising & Marketing business based in Austin, USA. As Founder & CTO I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing CRM Development capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end CRM Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Advertising & Marketing infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, CRM Development scope, and Advertising & Marketing context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Unleashed Technologies?
The cost of hiring Unleashed Technologies depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Unleashed Technologies's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $10000+.
How long does Unleashed Technologies take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Unleashed Technologies can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Unleashed Technologies?
Businesses may choose Unleashed Technologies based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2007, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Unleashed Technologies provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Unleashed Technologies, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Is Unleashed Technologies an offshore software development company?
Unleashed Technologies may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing and Agriculture, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
What engagement models does Unleashed Technologies provide?
Unleashed Technologies may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Can Unleashed Technologies build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Unleashed Technologies, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Which countries does Unleashed Technologies serve?
Unleashed Technologies may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What is Unleashed Technologies's software development process?
Unleashed Technologies typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, Mobile App Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $10,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0