Triple Tree Software

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (12 reviews)
4066907708 connect@tripletreellc.com Visit Website

About Triple Tree Software

Triple Tree Software is a technology company founded in 2016. Their core services include Custom Software Development. The company operates with a team of 2 - 9 professionals. Projects with this company average about $60,000. Triple Tree Software operates out of Bozeman, MT. This profile is a starting point — reach out to Triple Tree Software directly to discuss project specifics.

Where We Specialize

35% AI Development
AI Development 35%
IoT & Embedded 32%
Web Development 25%
Mobile App Development 8%

Industry Expertise

Real Estate55% Events & Event Management45%

Typical Project Size

45% Midmarket Business
43% Enterprise
12% Small Business

Triple Tree Software Reviews

Write a Review

Performance testing that identified a latency issue three weeks before our biggest traffic event

Declan Hartley / Chief Digital Officer - Southern Cross Technology
Verified
Feb 02, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryEvents & Event Management
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationOct 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Southern Cross Technology, a growth-stage Events & Event Management business based in Sydney, Australia. As Chief Digital Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Events & Event Management market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Quality Assurance & Testing requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Quality Assurance & Testing, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Sydney, Australia and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Events & Event Management sector looking for Quality Assurance & Testing expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

From legacy on-premise to cloud-native in a timeline the vendor community said was impossible

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 03, 2026

Project summary: Our agents were spending more time managing data across disconnected systems than managing relationships. We needed a unified platform to give them that time back.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
3.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCloud Services
IndustryReal Estate
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMay 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd operates in the Real Estate sector with headquarters in Singapore. In my role as CTO I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Real Estate market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Cloud Services requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Cloud Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Real Estate sector had used them for a comparable Cloud Services engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Cloud Services depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Real Estate network — in both cases to peers facing Cloud Services challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Triple Tree LLC?
The cost of hiring Triple Tree LLC depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Triple Tree LLC's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Which industries does Triple Tree LLC serve?
Triple Tree LLC has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Real Estate, Insurance, Mining & Metals, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Nonprofit & NGO.
Is Triple Tree LLC suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Triple Tree LLC because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2016.
How long does Triple Tree LLC take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, Triple Tree LLC can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does Triple Tree LLC provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Triple Tree LLC, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Branding, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it has served clients in USA.
Is Triple Tree LLC an offshore software development company?
Triple Tree LLC may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Branding, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design.
Can Triple Tree LLC build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Triple Tree LLC, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Branding, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Does Triple Tree LLC sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Triple Tree LLC, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Insurance, Mining & Metals, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Which countries does Triple Tree LLC serve?
Triple Tree LLC may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Triple Tree LLC develop SaaS products?
Yes, Triple Tree LLC may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span App Marketing, Branding, Mobile App Development, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design.

Company Info

Founded 2016
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate Undisclosed
Avg. Project Cost $10,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.4