About Nilogy
Nilogy has been in business since 2013, delivering technology projects for clients. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development and Custom Software Development. Its team includes 10 - 49 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. The average project on record costs around $25,000. These details offer a useful starting point when evaluating Nilogy.
Where We Specialize
Industry Expertise
Typical Project Size
Nilogy Reviews
Write a ReviewHeadless commerce architecture that gave our content and marketing teams genuine independence
Elliot Thorne / Managing Director, Tech - Redwood Capital AdvisorsJan 31, 2026
Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.
We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.
Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout
Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it
Questions & Answers
Real-time dashboards that our executives now open before any other application
Fatima Al-Suwaidi / Head of Digital Strategy - Gulf FinTech HoldingsJan 21, 2026
Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.
Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.
Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout
Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it