NEXTFLY Web Design

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (12 reviews)
3172193111 hello@nextfly.com Visit Website

About NEXTFLY Web Design

Since 2000, NEXTFLY Web Design has operated as a technology services provider. NEXTFLY Web Design focuses on Web Development and Digital Marketing. With 10 - 49 people on staff, NEXTFLY Web Design can take on projects of varying size. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $60,000. NEXTFLY Web Design operates out of Indianapolis, IN. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with NEXTFLY Web Design.

Where We Specialize

20% Enterprise App Modernization
Enterprise App Modernization 20%
ERP Solutions 17%
Business Analysis & Consulting 16%
Mobile App Design 15%
Game Development 13%
Mobile App Development 9%
Social Media Marketing 6%
VR App Development 4%

Industry Expertise

Gaming & Gambling73% Advertising & Marketing27%

Typical Project Size

54% Midmarket Business
25% Small Business
21% Enterprise

NEXTFLY Web Design Reviews

Write a Review

Observability stack that caught three production issues before any user reported them

Liselotte Bakker / Head of Platform Engineering - Harbour Digital BV
Verified
Jan 24, 2026

Project summary: Multi-touch attribution across our media mix had become the most-requested capability from every client in our portfolio. We could not deliver it without rebuilding our data layer.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeDevOps Services
IndustryAdvertising & Marketing
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Harbour Digital BV operates in the Advertising & Marketing sector with headquarters in Utrecht, Netherlands. In my role as Head of Platform Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant DevOps Services investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily DevOps Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

User research that uncovered friction we had stopped noticing because it was always there

Adriana Voss / Director of Platform Engineering - Cascadia Digital Ventures
Verified
Jan 17, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeUI/UX Design
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Cascadia Digital Ventures operates in the Gaming & Gambling sector with headquarters in Vancouver, Canada. In my role as Director of Platform Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full UI/UX Design lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their UI/UX Design approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Gaming & Gambling contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Gaming & Gambling sector looking for UI/UX Design expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire NEXTFLY Web Design?
The cost of hiring NEXTFLY Web Design depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, NEXTFLY Web Design's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Which industries does NEXTFLY Web Design serve?
NEXTFLY Web Design has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Automotive, Human Resources, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Sports & Fitness and Real Estate.
What technologies does NEXTFLY Web Design specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, NEXTFLY Web Design may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Human Resources, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Sports & Fitness and Real Estate.
Is NEXTFLY Web Design an offshore software development company?
NEXTFLY Web Design may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Human Resources, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Sports & Fitness and Real Estate, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
Does NEXTFLY Web Design offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like NEXTFLY Web Design provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What engagement models does NEXTFLY Web Design provide?
NEXTFLY Web Design may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2000.
Can NEXTFLY Web Design build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including NEXTFLY Web Design, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Human Resources, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Sports & Fitness and Real Estate, and it has served clients in USA.
Does NEXTFLY Web Design sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including NEXTFLY Web Design, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Human Resources, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Sports & Fitness and Real Estate.
What is NEXTFLY Web Design's software development process?
NEXTFLY Web Design typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.

Company Info

Founded 2000
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $30,000+
Client Rating 4.6/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.8
Communication
4.5