Inwizards Software Technology

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
+91209667584436 info@inwizards.com Visit Website

About Inwizards Software Technology

Inwizards Software Technology has been in business since 2015, delivering technology projects for clients. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. With 50 - 249 people on staff, Inwizards Software Technology can take on projects of varying size. Clients can expect pricing around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $35,000. Inwizards Software Technology holds a 5.0-star rating across 3 client reviews. Their home base is Indore, India. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Inwizards Software Technology.

Where We Specialize

29% AR App Development
AR App Development 29%
Web Development 25%
AI Development 25%
Virtual Reality 16%
Mobile App Development 5%

Industry Expertise

Healthcare100%

Typical Project Size

40% Enterprise
30% Small Business
30% Midmarket Business

Inwizards Software Technology Reviews

Write a Review

The team designed for our users' actual behaviour, not for the persona we thought they were

Flynn Buchanan / GM of Technology - Pacific Rim Commerce Group
Verified
Jan 28, 2026

Project summary: Serialisation requirements under new traceability legislation had a compliance deadline. Our supply chain system required targeted development to meet it — generalist knowledge was not sufficient.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeUI/UX Design
IndustryPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As GM of Technology at Pacific Rim Commerce Group I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology operations in Perth, Australia. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our UI/UX Design capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was UI/UX Design delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their UI/UX Design approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex UI/UX Design programme in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

CMS that preserved every byte of SEO equity from the old site while adding every feature we needed

Nisha Pillai / Director of Engineering - GrowthBridge Ventures
Verified
Jan 20, 2026

Project summary: Integration between our clinic management system and our patient-facing app had been a recurring failure point. We needed an engineering partner who could own the integration layer end to end.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryHealthcare
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at GrowthBridge Ventures, a growth-stage Healthcare business based in Pune, India. As Director of Engineering my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Healthcare segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The CMS Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end CMS Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Healthcare sector had used them for a comparable CMS Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, CMS Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the CMS Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Healthcare sector looking for CMS Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

What services does Inwizards offer?
Inwizards provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
How much does it cost to hire Inwizards?
The cost of hiring Inwizards depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Inwizards's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Which industries does Inwizards serve?
Inwizards has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Environmental Services, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Telecommunications, Construction, Healthcare and Manufacturing.
Is Inwizards suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Inwizards because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Telecommunications, Construction, Healthcare and Manufacturing.
Can Inwizards build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Inwizards, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
Does Inwizards sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Inwizards, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Environmental Services, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Telecommunications, Construction, Healthcare and Manufacturing, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Which countries does Inwizards serve?
Inwizards may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What is Inwizards's software development process?
Inwizards typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
How do I request a proposal from Inwizards?
You can request a proposal from Inwizards by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.

Company Info

Founded 2015
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $40,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.4