Gorilla Logic

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
283032920974-7088 chris.johnson@gorillalogic.com Visit Website

About Gorilla Logic

Gorilla Logic has been in business since 2002, delivering technology projects for clients. Their core services include Mobile App Development. The company operates with a team of 250 - 999 professionals. Typical hourly rates run around $50 - $99 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $55,000. Clients have rated Gorilla Logic 4.9 out of 5 in 23 reviews. Gorilla Logic operates out of Broomfield, CO. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Gorilla Logic.

Where We Specialize

28% IoT Development
IoT Development 28%
AI Development 23%
Software Development 18%
AI Development 13%
Web Development 10%
Mobile App Development 8%

Industry Expertise

Telecommunications78% Sports & Fitness22%

Typical Project Size

36% Enterprise
36% Midmarket Business
28% Small Business

Gorilla Logic Reviews

Write a Review

Project delivered with the kind of professionalism that earns a long-term relationship

Travis Bennett / Managing Director, Tech - Irongate Capital
Verified
Jul 18, 2024

Project summary: Our legacy BSS stack was preventing us from launching new products faster than our competitors and we needed a modern, API-first replacement that our team could actually maintain.

The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.

PROS

Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJun 2025 – Jul 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Managing Director, Tech at Irongate Capital, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Telecommunications clients from Atlanta, USA. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Embedded Systems Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Embedded Systems Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Embedded Systems Development scope, and Telecommunications context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Telecommunications sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Telecommunications domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Embedded Systems Development engagement, this team is the answer.

Multiplayer backend that held up under launch-day load without a single crash

Maryam Al-Zahrani / Head of Innovation - Al-Salam Digital Solutions
Verified
Apr 26, 2022

Project summary: Our competitors had been investing in technology for two years and we needed to close a meaningful gap quickly without compromising on the quality of what we shipped.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustrySports & Fitness
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJun 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Innovation at Al-Salam Digital Solutions, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Sports & Fitness clients from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia was not going to scale internationally, and the Game Development requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Game Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Game Development scope, and Sports & Fitness context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new Game Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of Game Development expertise, Sports & Fitness domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

FAQs

What services does Gorilla Logic offer?
Gorilla Logic provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
How much does it cost to hire Gorilla Logic?
The cost of hiring Gorilla Logic depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Gorilla Logic's typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Why should businesses choose Gorilla Logic?
Businesses may choose Gorilla Logic based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2002, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Gorilla Logic provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Gorilla Logic, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Gorilla Logic, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has been operating since 2002.
Is Gorilla Logic an offshore software development company?
Gorilla Logic may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Telecommunications, Sports & Fitness, Travel & Hospitality, Events & Event Management and Construction, and it has been operating since 2002.
Can Gorilla Logic build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Gorilla Logic, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has been operating since 2002.
Does Gorilla Logic sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Gorilla Logic, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has served clients in USA.
Which countries does Gorilla Logic serve?
Gorilla Logic may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Gorilla Logic develop SaaS products?
Yes, Gorilla Logic may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.

Company Info

Founded 2002
Employees 250 - 999
Hourly Rate $50 - $99 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $35,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.3