Fishermen Labs

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
283102920853-3762 info@fishermenlabs.com Visit Website

About Fishermen Labs

Since 2014, Fishermen Labs has operated as a technology services provider. Fishermen Labs focuses on Mobile App Development. With 10 - 49 people on staff, Fishermen Labs can take on projects of varying size. Typical hourly rates run around $150 - $199 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $50,000. Fishermen Labs holds a 5.0-star rating across 19 client reviews. Their home base is Irvine, CA. These details offer a useful starting point when evaluating Fishermen Labs.

Where We Specialize

27% Mobile App Development
Mobile App Development 27%
Enterprise App Development 24%
Branding 17%
AI Development 15%
Ionic App Development 12%
VR App Development 5%

Industry Expertise

Healthcare50% Media & Entertainment50%

Typical Project Size

53% Small Business
26% Midmarket Business
21% Enterprise

Fishermen Labs Reviews

Write a Review

Blockchain solution that eliminated the trust problem we had lived with for years

Jisoo Kwon / CTO - HanRiver Tech Co Ltd
Verified
Jul 12, 2022

Project summary: Our hospital network required a unified patient data platform that could integrate with existing EMR systems while meeting all relevant data protection obligations.

Our industry has specific compliance requirements that many generalist agencies struggle with. This team came with working knowledge of the relevant frameworks, asked pointed questions about our obligations, and built controls into the architecture rather than bolting them on at the end. Our compliance team reviewed the delivered system and had only minor observations, which is genuinely unusual for a first-pass review. That domain awareness saved us significant remediation cost.

PROS

Consistent delivery against milestones, code quality that passed our internal review without major findings, post-launch support that felt like a partnership not a ticket queue

CONS

The initial project brief document they required was more detailed than we were used to providing, but in hindsight that rigour was part of why the project ran so smoothly

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryHealthcare
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
HanRiver Tech Co Ltd operates across the Healthcare sector with offices in Seoul, South Korea. In my capacity as CTO I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Blockchain Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Blockchain Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Honestly, the quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process set them apart. Most vendors listen to the brief and come back with a solution to exactly what you described. This team came back with a solution to what we actually needed, which turned out to be somewhat different. That kind of consultative instinct is what we were looking for.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Healthcare sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Seoul, South Korea and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Blockchain Development platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Healthcare business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Healthcare domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Blockchain Development engagement, this team is the answer.

Edge computing architecture that handles our sensor load without breaking a sweat

Lukas Becker / Head of Digitalisation - Becker Industrie GmbH
Verified
Apr 11, 2022

Project summary: Our editorial team was managing content across seven different tools with no single source of truth — we needed a unified CMS that could handle structured and rich-media content equally well.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Honestly nothing worth documenting — we went in with high expectations and they were met on every measure

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationAug 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Becker Industrie GmbH, a mid-sized organisation in the Media & Entertainment sector headquartered in Munich, Germany. My remit as Head of Digitalisation covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in Munich, Germany was not going to scale internationally, and the IoT Development requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full IoT Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, IoT Development scope, and Media & Entertainment context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Media & Entertainment operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Media & Entertainment sector who were facing similar IoT Development challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

FAQs

Which industries does Fishermen Labs serve?
Fishermen Labs has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Legal Services, Construction, Environmental Services and Sports & Fitness.
Is Fishermen Labs suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Fishermen Labs because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Legal Services, Construction, Environmental Services and Sports & Fitness, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
What technologies does Fishermen Labs specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Fishermen Labs may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Legal Services, Construction, Environmental Services and Sports & Fitness.
How can I contact Fishermen Labs for a project?
Businesses can contact Fishermen Labs through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Legal Services, Construction, Environmental Services and Sports & Fitness, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Fishermen Labs, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Legal Services, Construction, Environmental Services and Sports & Fitness, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Is Fishermen Labs an offshore software development company?
Fishermen Labs may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
What engagement models does Fishermen Labs provide?
Fishermen Labs may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2014.
Does Fishermen Labs sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Fishermen Labs, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in USA.
How do I request a proposal from Fishermen Labs?
You can request a proposal from Fishermen Labs by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2014.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $150 - $199 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.5