Enola Labs Software - Out of Business

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (12 reviews)
5125376394 hello@enolalabs.com Visit Website

About Enola Labs Software - Out of Business

Enola Labs Software - Out of Business is a technology company founded in 2012. Enola Labs Software - Out of Business focuses on Mobile App Development. Its team includes 10 - 49 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $35,000. Enola Labs Software - Out of Business holds a 4.6-star rating across 6 client reviews. Their home base is Austin, TX. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Enola Labs Software - Out of Business.

Where We Specialize

38% AI Development
AI Development 38%
Mobile App Development 31%
Web Development 17%
Web Design 10%
AI Development 4%

Industry Expertise

Entertainment100%

Typical Project Size

44% Small Business
43% Enterprise
13% Midmarket Business

Enola Labs Software - Out of Business Reviews

Write a Review

Purpose-built software that made our competitors' off-the-shelf tools look obsolete

Eoghan Fitzgerald / VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Feb 09, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

5.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Shannon Tech Solutions Ltd operates in the Gaming & Gambling sector with headquarters in Dublin, Ireland. In my role as VP of Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Gaming & Gambling segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Software Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Software Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Dublin, Ireland and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Gaming & Gambling network — in both cases to peers facing Software Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

IoT architecture that scaled from pilot to full fleet without a single redesign

Cameron Aldrich / Head of Digital Operations - Northstar Logistics Corp
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Our legacy LMS had been built for a classroom-first world. Hybrid delivery had exposed its limitations and student satisfaction scores had reflected that for two consecutive years.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryEducation
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Digital Operations at Northstar Logistics Corp I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Education operations in Denver, USA. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IoT Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IoT Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Education sector had used them for a comparable IoT Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, IoT Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the IoT Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex IoT Development programme in the Education space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

FAQs

What services does Enola Labs Software offer?
Enola Labs Software provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Big Data, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
How much does it cost to hire Enola Labs Software?
The cost of hiring Enola Labs Software depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Enola Labs Software's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $100000+.
What technologies does Enola Labs Software specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Enola Labs Software may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Big Data, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Construction and Nonprofit & NGO.
Is Enola Labs Software an offshore software development company?
Enola Labs Software may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does Enola Labs Software offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Enola Labs Software provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Big Data, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Construction and Nonprofit & NGO.
Which countries does Enola Labs Software serve?
Enola Labs Software may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Enola Labs Software develop SaaS products?
Yes, Enola Labs Software may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Construction and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What is Enola Labs Software's software development process?
Enola Labs Software typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span Big Data, Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
How do I request a proposal from Enola Labs Software?
You can request a proposal from Enola Labs Software by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Construction and Nonprofit & NGO, and it has served clients in USA.

Company Info

Founded 2012
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $60,000+
Client Rating 4.6/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.5