About E Virtual Services
E Virtual Services is a software development company that turns ideas into working products. E Virtual Services focuses on Mobile App Development. With 50 - 249 people on staff, E Virtual Services can take on projects of varying size. Typical hourly rates run around $50 - $99/hr, with an average project cost near $55,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to E Virtual Services directly to discuss project specifics.
Where We Specialize
Industry Expertise
Typical Project Size
E Virtual Services Reviews
Write a ReviewTest automation that our developers adopted as a genuine aid rather than a compliance exercise
Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte LtdJan 29, 2026
Project summary: Multi-touch attribution across our media mix had become the most-requested capability from every client in our portfolio. We could not deliver it without rebuilding our data layer.
The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.
Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery
Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project
Questions & Answers
Responsive, accessible, and fast — every standard met, every deadline hit
Beatriz Cavalcanti / Chief Digital Officer - Cerrado Tech SAJan 13, 2026
Project summary: Our agents were spending more time managing data across disconnected systems than managing relationships. We needed a unified platform to give them that time back.
The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.
Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review
Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons