CreativeBox

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
+35699468171 info@creativebox.com.mt Visit Website

About CreativeBox

CreativeBox works with clients to plan, build, and ship digital products. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. With 2 - 9 people on staff, CreativeBox can take on projects of varying size. The average project on record costs around $10,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to CreativeBox directly to discuss project specifics.

Where We Specialize

20% E-commerce Development
E-commerce Development 20%
Game Development 18%
Social Media Marketing 17%
SEO 16%
Mobile App Development 12%
Branding 10%
Web Development 7%

Industry Expertise

Logistics100%

Typical Project Size

42% Enterprise
34% Small Business
24% Midmarket Business

CreativeBox Reviews

Write a Review

Finance and operations now work from identical numbers — the value of that cannot be overstated

Yuki Hashimoto / Head of Product Development - East Asia Commerce KK
Verified
Mar 18, 2026

Project summary: A content deal had given us the rights to a major catalogue but our delivery infrastructure could not stream it reliably at scale. We needed a cloud-native video platform in under six months.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationOct 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Product Development at East Asia Commerce KK I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Media & Entertainment operations in Osaka, Japan. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end ERP Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their ERP Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Media & Entertainment contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Media & Entertainment experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Osaka, Japan and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Media & Entertainment sector looking for ERP Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Automation that freed our team from repetitive analysis and let them focus on strategy

Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud AB
Verified
Feb 09, 2026

Project summary: Our mobile app had a 2.9-star average review score. The two themes in every negative review were speed and booking flow complexity — both were solvable with the right engineering partner.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryTravel & Hospitality
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMay 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Nordic Cloud AB, a growth-stage Travel & Hospitality business based in Stockholm, Sweden. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Travel & Hospitality market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The AI & Machine Learning requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full AI & Machine Learning lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AI & Machine Learning programme in the Travel & Hospitality space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire CreativeBox?
The cost of hiring CreativeBox depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, CreativeBox's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Which industries does CreativeBox serve?
CreativeBox has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Education, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Telecommunications, Nonprofit & NGO and Retail & E-commerce.
What technologies does CreativeBox specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, CreativeBox may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has served clients in Malta, and it has been operating since 2016.
Does CreativeBox provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including CreativeBox, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has served clients in Malta, and its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.
How can I contact CreativeBox for a project?
Businesses can contact CreativeBox through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Is CreativeBox an offshore software development company?
CreativeBox may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Education, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Telecommunications, Nonprofit & NGO and Retail & E-commerce, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What engagement models does CreativeBox provide?
CreativeBox may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Education, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Telecommunications, Nonprofit & NGO and Retail & E-commerce, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Does CreativeBox sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including CreativeBox, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Game Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and it has experience across industries such as Education, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Telecommunications, Nonprofit & NGO and Retail & E-commerce.
What is CreativeBox's software development process?
CreativeBox typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Education, Media & Entertainment, Travel & Hospitality, Telecommunications, Nonprofit & NGO and Retail & E-commerce, and it has been operating since 2016.
How do I request a proposal from CreativeBox?
You can request a proposal from CreativeBox by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Malta, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Company Info

Founded 2016
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $40,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.3