Boise Web

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (2 reviews)
+12085142556 contact@boiseweb.co Visit Website

About Boise Web

Boise Web is a technology company founded in 2013. The company's main offerings are Web Development. Its team includes 2 - 9 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Clients can expect pricing around $50 - $99/hr, with projects averaging about $50,000. These details offer a useful starting point when evaluating Boise Web.

Where We Specialize

27% Web Development
Web Development 27%
VR App Development 19%
Enterprise App Modernization 18%
Ethereum Blockchain 16%
Mobile App Development 10%
AR App Development 6%
AI Development 4%

Industry Expertise

Hospitality80% Travel20%

Typical Project Size

48% Enterprise
33% Midmarket Business
19% Small Business

Boise Web Reviews

Write a Review

Custom editorial tooling that fits how our team actually works

Tyler Nguyen / Founder & CTO - BlueRidge Software
Verified
Mar 30, 2025

Project summary: Buyer expectations had shifted dramatically toward digital-first experiences and our static listing site was no longer competitive with the portals our clients were comparing us against.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

The volume of quality documentation they produced was genuinely impressive but also meant our team needed dedicated time to review it properly — a minor process point, not a complaint

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryReal Estate
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationNov 2024 – Dec 2024

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
BlueRidge Software operates across the Real Estate sector with offices in Austin, USA. In my capacity as Founder & CTO I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the CMS Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily CMS Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in CMS Development and specific knowledge of the Real Estate sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Real Estate sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Austin, USA and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Real Estate operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

Architecture review that uncovered risks and opportunities in equal measure

Oliver Harrington / Chief Technology Officer - Meridian Consulting Ltd
Verified
Mar 20, 2022

Project summary: Our competitors had been investing in technology for two years and we needed to close a meaningful gap quickly without compromising on the quality of what we shipped.

The technical quality of the work is the easiest thing to praise, but what I want to highlight is the communication culture on this team. Every question got a same-day response. Every risk got flagged before it became an issue. When we needed to change direction mid-project — a business decision on our side — they absorbed the change professionally, requoted fairly, and kept momentum going. That flexibility is something you cannot assess in a proposal and it turned out to be one of the most valuable things about working with them.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

4.7
Overall
4.7
Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.7
Communication
Project TypeIT Consulting
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationApr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Meridian Consulting Ltd operates across the Gaming & Gambling sector with offices in London, UK. In my capacity as Chief Technology Officer I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the IT Consulting expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end IT Consulting delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Gaming & Gambling infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in IT Consulting and specific knowledge of the Gaming & Gambling sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between London, UK and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Gaming & Gambling domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of IT Consulting expertise, Gaming & Gambling domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

FAQs

Which industries does Boise Web serve?
Boise Web has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Real Estate, Gaming & Gambling and Food & Beverage.
What technologies does Boise Web specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Boise Web may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Gaming & Gambling and Food & Beverage.
How long does Boise Web take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, Boise Web can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Boise Web?
Businesses may choose Boise Web based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2013, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How can I contact Boise Web for a project?
Businesses can contact Boise Web through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Gaming & Gambling and Food & Beverage.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Boise Web, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2013.
Which countries does Boise Web serve?
Boise Web may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Boise Web modernize legacy software?
Boise Web may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Gaming & Gambling and Food & Beverage, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
What is Boise Web's software development process?
Boise Web typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2013.
How do I request a proposal from Boise Web?
You can request a proposal from Boise Web by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2013.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.6/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6