Bitbean.com

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.2/5 (12 reviews)
732-806-1125 info@bitbean.com Visit Website

About Bitbean.com

Since 2011, Bitbean.com has operated as a technology services provider. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. The company operates with a team of 50 - 249 professionals. Clients can expect pricing around $150 - $199 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $60,000. Bitbean.com holds a 5.0-star rating across 12 client reviews. Their home base is Lakewood, NJ. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Bitbean.com.

Where We Specialize

37% Enterprise App Modernization
Enterprise App Modernization 37%
VR App Development 23%
Web Development 14%
AI Development 14%
Mobile App Development 12%

Industry Expertise

Retail100%

Typical Project Size

35% Midmarket Business
34% Enterprise
31% Small Business

Bitbean.com Reviews

Write a Review

Web development done properly — performant, scalable, and a joy to maintain

Charlotte Whitfield / Head of Digital Commerce - Sterling Retail PLC
Verified
Mar 11, 2023

Project summary: Underwriting decisions that should have taken minutes were taking days because of a legacy policy administration system that predated modern API architecture.

The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeWeb Development
IndustryInsurance
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationOct 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Sterling Retail PLC is a Insurance business based in Manchester, UK. As Head of Digital Commerce I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Insurance regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist Web Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Web Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Honestly, the quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process set them apart. Most vendors listen to the brief and come back with a solution to exactly what you described. This team came back with a solution to what we actually needed, which turned out to be somewhat different. That kind of consultative instinct is what we were looking for.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we did at the start, which sounds like an exaggeration but is genuinely accurate. The discovery workshop they ran surfaced assumptions we had not examined and contradictions in our requirements that would have caused real problems mid-development. The functional specification they produced was the clearest articulation of our product that we had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Web Development platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Insurance business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of Web Development expertise, Insurance domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

Content platform our editors adopted without a single training complaint

Hannah Richter / Chief Innovation Officer - Rhein Digital AG
Verified
Jan 30, 2022

Project summary: The project had both a hard delivery date tied to a board commitment and a scope that our previous agency had told us was not achievable. We needed someone to prove otherwise.

I have worked with development agencies on four continents over the past fifteen years and this team sits comfortably in the top tier. What separated them was not just technical skill, which was genuinely impressive, but their instinct for asking the right business questions before reaching for a technical answer. The project ran to schedule, the architecture is clean and well-documented, and the handover was thorough. Six months after go-live we have not raised a single critical support ticket. That speaks for itself.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Rhein Digital AG, a mid-sized organisation in the Construction sector headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. My remit as Chief Innovation Officer covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the CMS Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily CMS Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in CMS Development and specific knowledge of the Construction sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Frankfurt, Germany and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Construction space looking for a CMS Development partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Bitbean?
The cost of hiring Bitbean depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Bitbean's typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $25000+.
Is Bitbean suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Bitbean because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Custom Software Development and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Construction, Telecommunications, Real Estate, Advertising & Marketing and Mining & Metals.
Why should businesses choose Bitbean?
Businesses may choose Bitbean based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2011, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Bitbean provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Bitbean, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Construction, Telecommunications, Real Estate, Advertising & Marketing and Mining & Metals, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Bitbean, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Construction, Telecommunications, Real Estate, Advertising & Marketing and Mining & Metals.
Is Bitbean an offshore software development company?
Bitbean may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Construction, Telecommunications, Real Estate, Advertising & Marketing and Mining & Metals.
Does Bitbean offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Bitbean provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Custom Software Development and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Can Bitbean build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Bitbean, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Custom Software Development and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Does Bitbean sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Bitbean, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Custom Software Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What is Bitbean's software development process?
Bitbean typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2011.

Company Info

Founded 2011
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $150 - $199 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $60,000+
Client Rating 4.2/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.2
Schedule
4.1
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.1