Amplimark

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
5152256438 projects@amplimark.com Visit Website

About Amplimark

Businesses looking for a reliable technology partner often consider Amplimark. Their core services include Digital Marketing and Web Development. Amplimark employs 2 - 9 people. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $50,000. Amplimark holds a 5.0-star rating across 3 client reviews. Their home base is West Des Moines, IA. Overall, Amplimark is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Where We Specialize

15% Mobile App Development
Mobile App Development 15%
Game Development 13%
IoT & Embedded 13%
Logo Designing 12%
Mobile App Design 12%
Social Media Marketing 10%
Maintenance 8%
Business Analysis & Consulting 7%
VR App Development 5%
Enterprise App Modernization 2%
Cloud Computing Software 2%
Advertising, Media 1%

Industry Expertise

Logistics42% Sports41% Fitness17%

Typical Project Size

52% Midmarket Business
33% Enterprise
15% Small Business

Amplimark Reviews

Write a Review

CI/CD pipeline that turned our two-week releases into same-day deployments

Karolina Dabrowska / CTO - Krakow Tech Studio
Verified
Jun 03, 2024

Project summary: Several previous vendor relationships had left us cautious. We needed a partner who would be honest about complexity upfront rather than discovering it mid-project.

I have worked with development agencies on four continents over the past fifteen years and this team sits comfortably in the top tier. What separated them was not just technical skill, which was genuinely impressive, but their instinct for asking the right business questions before reaching for a technical answer. The project ran to schedule, the architecture is clean and well-documented, and the handover was thorough. Six months after go-live we have not raised a single critical support ticket. That speaks for itself.

PROS

Business-aware approach to every technical decision, strong project governance, fast turnaround on feedback, zero drama during a genuinely complex engagement

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDevOps Services
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationOct 2024 – Nov 2024

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Krakow Tech Studio operates across the Aerospace & Defense sector with offices in Krakow, Poland. In my capacity as CTO I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Aerospace & Defense competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the DevOps Services work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full DevOps Services lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable DevOps Services engagement in the Aerospace & Defense space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Krakow, Poland and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some agencies disappear the moment the final invoice is paid. This team maintained the same level of responsiveness during the hypercare period as during development, handed over thorough documentation without being asked twice, and checked in proactively a month after go-live to review performance metrics with us. That last part was entirely unprompted.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Aerospace & Defense sector who were facing similar DevOps Services challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

A studio partner who played the game as users would and built it accordingly

Minjun Oh / Director of Engineering - Sejong Digital Corp
Verified
Sep 27, 2022

Project summary: We had a clear product vision but lacked the engineering capacity internally to execute it within the window our market opportunity required.

Our previous agency had given us a platform that worked well enough to demo and fell apart under real load. This team came in, diagnosed the root causes accurately, and rebuilt the critical components without disrupting the live service. The performance improvements were immediate and measurable — page load times dropped by 60 percent, error rates dropped to near zero, and our support team has far fewer incidents to deal with. The contrast with our previous experience could not have been sharper.

PROS

Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence

CONS

Time zone difference required some adjustment to our internal communication habits but the team managed the overlap window efficiently and it never affected momentum

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeGame Development
IndustryAgriculture
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of Engineering at Sejong Digital Corp, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Agriculture clients from Busan, South Korea. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Game Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Game Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable Game Development engagement in the Agriculture space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Agriculture domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Agriculture sector who were facing similar Game Development challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

FAQs

Which industries does Amplimark serve?
Amplimark has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Aerospace & Defense, Agriculture, Nonprofit & NGO, Human Resources, Energy & Utilities and Events & Event Management.
Does Amplimark provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Amplimark, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Amplimark, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Content Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Is Amplimark an offshore software development company?
Amplimark may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Does Amplimark offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Amplimark provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span Branding, Content Marketing, Digital Strategy, Mobile App Development and SEO.
What engagement models does Amplimark provide?
Amplimark may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Can Amplimark build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Amplimark, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Which countries does Amplimark serve?
Amplimark may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Amplimark develop SaaS products?
Yes, Amplimark may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What is Amplimark's software development process?
Amplimark typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Agriculture, Nonprofit & NGO, Human Resources, Energy & Utilities and Events & Event Management.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $100 - $149 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.3