77 Digital

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
+50640318449 info@77digital.com Visit Website

About 77 Digital

77 Digital has been in business since 2011, delivering technology projects for clients. Their core services include Custom Software Development. Its team includes 10 - 49 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Typical hourly rates run around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $45,000. Clients have rated 77 Digital 5.0 out of 5 in 2 reviews. 77 Digital operates out of Tibás, Costa Rica. Overall, 77 Digital is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Where We Specialize

24% Game Development
Game Development 24%
Business Analysis & Consulting 24%
Cloud Computing Software 13%
Virtual Reality 12%
AI Development 11%
Mobile App Development 6%
Enterprise App Modernization 6%
Ruby on Rails Development 4%

Industry Expertise

Food52% Restaurant48%

Typical Project Size

81% Small Business
12% Midmarket Business
7% Enterprise

77 Digital Reviews

Write a Review

Custom platform that our engineering team is still proud to maintain two years later

Maja Söderström / Head of Product Engineering - Scandia Digital AB
Verified
Jan 27, 2026

Project summary: Our trading platform had been extended incrementally for seven years. Latency was degrading, technical debt was compounding, and a clean rebuild was no longer optional.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationAug 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Scandia Digital AB, a growth-stage Financial Services business based in Gothenburg, Sweden. As Head of Product Engineering my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Financial Services market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Software Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Software Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Financial Services sector had used them for a comparable Software Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Software Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Gothenburg, Sweden and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Financial Services sector looking for Software Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

An app our customers return to daily — the engagement numbers speak for themselves

Adriana Voss / Director of Platform Engineering - Cascadia Digital Ventures
Verified
Jan 02, 2026

Project summary: Grid modernisation funding required us to demonstrate demand-response capability. The machine learning models existed on paper; we needed an engineering partner to build and productionise them.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeMobile App Development
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Cascadia Digital Ventures is an established Energy & Utilities organisation headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. My role as Director of Platform Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Mobile App Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Mobile App Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Energy & Utilities experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Energy & Utilities sector looking for Mobile App Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

What services does 77 Digital offer?
77 Digital provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Content Marketing, Digital Strategy, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.
How much does it cost to hire 77 Digital?
The cost of hiring 77 Digital depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, 77 Digital's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $100000+.
Which industries does 77 Digital serve?
77 Digital has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Real Estate, Construction, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Insurance and Nonprofit & NGO.
Why should businesses choose 77 Digital?
Businesses may choose 77 Digital based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2011, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does 77 Digital provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including 77 Digital, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Construction, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Insurance and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Is 77 Digital an offshore software development company?
77 Digital may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Construction, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Insurance and Nonprofit & NGO, and it has been operating since 2011.
Does 77 Digital sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including 77 Digital, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Construction, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Insurance and Nonprofit & NGO, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Can 77 Digital modernize legacy software?
77 Digital may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has served clients in Costa-rica, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Construction, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Insurance and Nonprofit & NGO.
What is 77 Digital's software development process?
77 Digital typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in Costa-rica, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
How do I request a proposal from 77 Digital?
You can request a proposal from 77 Digital by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Costa-rica, and it has been operating since 2011.

Company Info

Founded 2011
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $45,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.2